E
EIS ARCHIVED NEWSLETTERS
July 2001
The Desertification Information System/Environmental Information
System on the Internet (DIS/EISI) Programme for 2001 to
2003
By Dr Christophe Nuttall (UNITAR, Geneva, Switzerland)
1
The
DIS/EISI programme for 2001-2003
1.1
Background
Significant
efforts are being made to manage natural resources, involving
both scientific and technical research and the implementation
of appropriate programmes and projects in the field. The
results, in the form of both products and data, represent
a unique scientific, technical and cultural heritage for
sustainable development in Africa.
However,
it has to be recognized that this information heritage is
more often than not dispersed on account of sectoral compartmentalization
that in many cases is very marked, and which results in
duplicated activities that reduce the competitiveness of
institutions and constitute a waste of time, energy and
money. The huge body of data, information and products thus
accumulated does not always amount to a useable information
capital for three main reasons:
(i) the results of data collection and processing are confined to a limited number of users who often form part of the same professional, scientific and .....technical milieu;
(ii)the products generated are in many cases not transformed into information that can be directly used in decision‑making processes relating to the .....management of natural resources and the environment;(iii) the information remains too dispersed, restricted and hard to access by users at .....both the national and international levels owing to a lack of ......suitable mechanisms for the circulation of information.
The result of all this is an apparent lack of information at the local level which fails to reflect the existence in reality of a cultural and information heritage within national and international institutions or specialized bodies throughout the world. This loss of "institutional memory" due to dispersal and compartmentalization is now recognized as being one of the major obstacles to sustainable development in Africa.
1.2 International context
Strengthening
of the collection and exchange of information is recommended
by Agenda 21 (Chapter 40) and by other international
legal instruments relating to the environment, such as those
on climate change (Articles 5 and 12), biodiversity
(Articles 12, 17 and 18), combating desertification
(Articles 16 and 18), the Ramsar Convention, CITES,
etc.
Since
1994, moreover, several ITU conferences, in particular the
first World Telecommunication Development Conference (WTDC)
(Buenos Aires, 1994), the Plenipotentiary Conference (Kyoto, 1994)
and, above all, the second WTDC (Valletta, 1998), have
emphasized the role of telecommunication and information
technologies for environmental protection and sustainable
development. Among other things, WTDC‑98 specifically
recommended the following:
1)the implementation of a global operational telecommunication-environment
project on the development and use of telecommunication
and ...information technologies
for the protection of the environment and sustainable development,
which will be an interregional project with regional ...and/or
subregional components, and will take account of the specific
characteristics and needs of the different regions/subregions
concerned.
3 )the establishment of a framework for international cooperation which will enable all those concerned (governments of developed and developing ....countries, manufacturers and consumers of technology, private sector, international organizations, United Nations specialized agencies, etc.) to carry ....out, promote and develop projects to ensure optimum use of the most appropriate telecommunication and information technologies for the ....protection of the environment and sustainable development.
1.3 Objective
It
is in response to these needs, bearing in mind the current
status of environmental management in Africa, that it is
appropriate to develop environmental information and monitoring
systems on the Internet with a view to ensuring the availability
of useful information for decision‑makers, non‑governmental
bodies, civil society and the private sector.
In
this context, the DIS/EISI can be seen as a tool for the
management of environmental information in support of the
legal instruments relating to the environment in Africa:
desertification, biodiversity, climate change, wetlands,
etc.
2 Concept, approach and methods used
The
DIS/EISI concept is based on the combination of a participative
institutional approach and a technical process involving
the development of information and communication technologies
(ICTs). It responds to the needs expressed by a large number
of decision‑makers responsible for environmental matters
in developing countries. As well as being a technological
tool, it also seeks to encourage the various players involved
in the management of natural resources and the environment
to communicate better with one another and to share their
experiences and information heritage in the interests of
establishing a genuine partnership.
At
the institutional level, the concept seeks to bring about
a participative approach through partnership, coordination
through consultation and decision‑making through negotiated
consensus.
At
the technical level, an environmental information and monitoring
system on the Internet depends on the integration and networking
of existing databases and geographic information systems,
using Internet services to circulate information relating
to the management of natural resources and the environment
(documents and various types of product such as maps, data,
indicators and metadata).
The DIS/EISI serves the various partners concerned
with environmental issues, namely the authorities (coordination bodies, ministries and their respective
technical services, the scientific and technological community,
research and training institutions, etc.), civil society
(NGOs, associations, etc.) and partners in cooperation
(multilateral and bilateral development agencies, etc.).
The
users in question are thus:
national bodies responsible for coordinating
the United Nations conventions;
national, subregional and international
institutions;
technical directors and other technical
officials;
programme and project managers;
the scientific and technological community;
the media;
the general public.
The implementation and success of a DIS/EISI involves
three major phases comprising successive stages:
An institutional preparatory
phase comprising:
Ø
an awareness-building mission and feasibility
study;
Ø
an institutional profile of the environment
based on inventories;
Ø
a consultative forum for the players
concerned, for the purpose, among other things, of drawing
up an information charter to serve as a genuine draft agreement.
An equipment and training phasedesigned to strengthen the technical
capabilities of the institutions concerned and to train
technicians with a view to the creation of a network of
harmonized Web pages.
An evaluation, restitution and extension phase comprising:
Ø
internal and external evaluations aimed
at improving the DIS/EISI and adapting it to the evolving
needs of its users;
Ø
restitution in the form of a national
forum or workshop;
Ø
drawing up of arrangements for extending
the project to other national partners;
Ø
ideas for maintaining the project in
operation.
3
Assessment
of pilot projects
3.1
National pilot projects
Five pilot projects were launched in northern Africa
(Morocco and Tunisia) and western Africa (Benin, Mali and
Senegal), the methods used in their implementation having
been very similar in each country. Barring a few minor variations,
the following activities took place in each of the countries:
an awareness-building mission and feasibility
study for the purpose of defining the institutional and
technical frameworks and the terms of reference for implementation;
the elaboration of a national environmental
profile, involving the inventorying of institutions, legal
texts, programmes, projects and documents relating to the
environment;
a round table which, through the adoption
of an information charter, defined the roles of the various
partners and the content of the DIS/EISI on the basis of
the needs expressed;
one or more technical training sessions
on elaboration of the Web gateway and pages.
The way in which each of the five DIS/EISIs works
is very similar, following this structure:
|
An
institutional gateway, with each
partner owning its own website enabling it to become
acquainted with other partners. |
|
|
|
A thematic gateway
in which the information is organized according to
major sectors of activity (forestry, animal breeding,
agricultural production, irrigation, combating desertification,
biodiversity, etc.), the work of categorizing it according
to specific major themes being carried out by a panel
of bodies whose involvement is very broad. |
|
A virtual library
which, under the auspices of the documentation centers
of the different ministerial bodies, in gradually
opening up direct online access to reference material.
|
|
|
|
A virtual map library which, subject to the regulatory provisions in force, allows access to map resources (thematic maps, satellite images, aerial photographs, geodesic graticules, etc.). According
to the desired product, access will be possible in
the form of metadata (references),quick look(reduced
copy window),original(digital reproduction) or GIS
(map resulting from cross-referencing in a georeferenced
database accessible via the Internet – GeoWeb). |
Along these same lines, Uganda and Burkina Faso are
receiving technical assistance from OSS, through UNITAR,
to implement their pilot project.
All the countries of western, eastern and northern
Africa, as well as some countries in southern Africa, have
expressed the wish to implement such a DIS/EISI project.
The experience gained with the pilot projects thus
far carried out has shown up a number of obstacles which
need to be removed:
For financial reasons, the pilot projects
of beneficiary countries, with the exception of Benin and
Mali, which received additional funds within the framework
of a loan from the World Bank, did not receive sufficient
computer equipment to allow for full dissemination of the
EISI products. In future, an appropriate amount should therefore
be foreseen for such equipment.
Owing to a lack of technical capacity,
a number of DIS/EISI sites are hosted solely on the UNITAR
server. On-site server solutions should therefore be foreseen
as from the initial phase.
In some countries, difficulties arise
in the updating, of the DIS/EISIs, by the various partners.
In this regard, it will be necessary to introduce, from
the outset, measures that are more encouraging and motivating
on the one hand, and limiting on the other: technical solutions,
individual satisfaction, tasks included in the job description
of the person concerned, services provided linked to technical
training, etc.
3.2
The sub regional pilot project
Within
the framework of their subregional action programme, CILSS
and ECOWAS have begun to develop their own subregional EISI.
The principle of a subregional EISI is similar to that of
an EISI at the national level. Together with ITU and UNDP/UNSO,
and with support from France and the collaboration of OSS,
a subregional round table to draw up an information charter
was held with all the national focal points responsible
for implementation of the CCD as well as a number of representatives
of subregional organizations. It was also possible, following
a period of technical training, to set up a technical team
to prepare a prototype of the Western Africa EISI, the content
of which is also similar to that of the national EISIs.
Here
too the initial results are encouraging.
IGAD and UMA have in turn initiated a process for
the implementation of a subregional DIS/EISI. Subregional
meetings have been held in each of the two subregions. In
the case of IGAD, it was the various focal points for the
three conventions (climate change, desertification and biodiversity)
from the six member countries who together drew up the eastern
Africa EISI.
The subregional DIS/EISIs should ultimately come
to be the mechanisms for networking the various subregional
and national programmes and institutions through interconnection
of the national DIS/EISIs, thereby enabling the multi-scale
integration of available environmental data and information.
3.3 The regional pilot project
The DIS/EISI, known as the Africa DIS/EISI, is in
due course destined to become a gateway for:
regional data and information, based
on the major sustainable development themes, namely desertification,
climate change, biodiversity, wetlands, protected areas,
etc.;
the subregional EISIs;
the national EISIs.
In
its pilot phase, the DIS/EISI has devoted its efforts to
the development, together with UNEP's GRID Geneva, of the
GISWEB concept. GISWEB is a computer tool which enables
the user, without the need for a database, GIS software
or any particular technical knowledge, and in an interactive
fashion, to:
access, using any browser, a remote
georeferenced database;
display information layers (raster),
overlay vector plans, consult the corresponding legends,
etc.;
conduct analyses on the vector information
plans by means of mathematical or logical operators.
Such a tool is now operational, based on a georeferenced
database covering the entire African continent. The database
was put together from the various databases publicly available
from a number of data producers: UNEP, FAO, NASA, DCW, WRI,
IRD, etc.
3.4 Technical
materials
The experience jointly acquired by OSS and UNITAR
with financial and/or technical partners such as France,
Germany, the World Bank, GRID-UNEP, UNDP/UNSO, ITU and the
Fonds francophone des Inforoutes,
led to the production of:
A methodological guide to EISI implementation,
which runs through the various stages involved in setting
up an EISI. The methodological elements are provided in
the form of a toolbox;
A CD-ROM containing a list of all the
sites and products established within the framework of the
programme;
A dedicated site (http://www.sisei.net/
) providing online access to all these sites and products.
|
|
4 Objective
of the 2001-2003 programme and expected results
Under the 2001-2003 phase of the DIS/EISI programme,
the aim is to make the EISI concept operational in some
20 or more countries on the African continent and the four
subregions, namely CILSS/ECOWAS, IGAD, UMA and SADC. In
addition to the subregional bodies that will be implementing
their subregional systems, between three and seven countries
per subregion will be selected for the implementation of
national DIS/EISIs.
In order to implement the programme it will be necessary
to strengthen regional, subregional and national technical
and institutional capacities to make them directly capable
of initiating, providing training for, developing and monitoring
and evaluating the actual implementation of the subregional
and national DIS/EISIs.
Rather
than imposing a particular approach from the outside, the
introduction of such systems will, thanks to the participative
approach, be based on institutional agreements and technical
solutions proposed by the partners in the light of local
considerations and conditions.
The following may be mentioned on an indicative basis:
|
In Northern Africa: UMA ·
Algeria ·
Libya ·
Morocco ·
Mauritania ·
Tunisia ·
Egypt |
In Eastern Africa: IGAD ·
Djibouti ·
Ethiopia ·
Eritrea ·
Kenya ·
Uganda ·
Sudan |
|
In Western Africa: CILSS/ECOWAS ·
Burkina Faso ·
Niger ·
Nigeria ·
Ghana ·
Guinea ·
Mali ·
Côte d'Ivoire ·
Senegal ·
Chad ·
Cape Verde |
In Southern Africa: SADC ·
Botswana ·
Mauritius ·
Madagascar ·
Mozambique ·
Tanzania ·
Zimbabwe |
The main objectives being sought under the programme
and the specific results expected by those subregional organizations
and national institutions having already made their views
known are:
| - | The establishment of national capabilities
in the management of environmental information at the
subregional and national levels in order to be more
clearly aware of "who does what, where, how and
with what results?" in the different environmental
sectors. |
- |
Support for and encouragement of ongoing initiatives through the facilitation of direct exchanges of information and mutual cooperation between beneficiary African countries. This will make it possible to economize on efforts and financial resources to the extent that projects often cover ground that has already been covered by other projects elsewhere. |
- |
Development of the existing information heritage through encouragement and support for local initiatives and by facilitating the exchange of experience among the various local, national and subregional players, for the benefit of all concerned. The consequence will be to avoid redundancy and duplication of efforts in the collection and analysis of data on the one hand, and in the development of products designed to assist in the planning and decision-making process on the other. |
- |
The establishment, through a common gateway, of a network that is both operational and active on a day-to-day basis, and which brings together African institutions and the national and subregional focal points for the various international and regional legal instruments relating to the environment. |
- |
More specifically, the following is expected of the various DIS/EISIs: |
- |
The strengthening of national and subregional capabilities for the better management of environmental data and information (scientific articles, technical reports, field studies, databases, maps and other information sources); |
- |
The possibility for technical and political bodies to talk to one another in the interests of integrating their respective scientific and technical data in a process of planning and decision-making; |
- |
Improved ergonomics and use of Internet-based information sources in support of processes intended to provide aid to decision-making; |
- |
Improved planning processes thanks to a better understanding of environmental phenomena within a spatial and temporal perspective; |
- |
The contribution of natural resources management to sustainable development in general and to the fight against poverty in particular; |
- |
.Better collaboration and coordination between partners and players at different levels; |
- |
Better taking into account of the various players in participative decision-making processes; |
- |
Better access for institutions and the general public to environmental data and information in the public domain, such as legal texts; |
- |
The design of a telecommunication and information network interlinking national systems through the regional nodes; |
- |
Distance education through the bringing online of different environmental training modules; |
- |
A process of exchange and sharing for the purpose of ensuring coordination and synergy among different players and programmes having the same objectives, sometimes within the same areas, but without always being aware of the fact; |
- |
Shared assistance in the drafting of speeches, reports and studies on the basis of data that are known to be reliable and from common sources. |
5
Principles for the development of this new phase:
activities and roles of the different partners
Two
major phases are proposed for the redeployment of the programme:
1) The first relates
to capitalization and to the transfer of knowledge and skills
for the strengthening of regional, subregional and national
capabilities ahead of the decentralized implementation of
the programme. This phase lasts six months.
2 ) The second
phase relates to the in
situ implementation of the subregional and national
DIS/EISIs. This phase lasts 30 months.
During
this second phase, the four subregional DIS/EISIs and 28
national DIS/EISIs are gradually set up in a programmed
fashion. In parallel to this, the specialized tools such
as GISWEB are improved, transferred and incorporated into
the EISIs.
A
consortium made up of UNITAR, ITU, UNEP and UNOPS is set
up around OSS.
To
ensure that all of this takes place in a spirit of partnership
and in line with the various subregional contexts, the following
responsibilities are envisaged:
|
Responsibilities |
|
|
OSS: Autonomous international organization whose
members are UMA, CILSS and IGAD and their respective
member countries, as well as Egypt |
·
Responsible
for the programme: ensures political consistency vis-à-vis
its programmes within the framework of CCD and consistency
vis-à-vis the other conventions. ·
Is
mandated by UMA to be the operator for DIS/EISI northern
Africa. ·
Carries
out a global evaluation of the programme on behalf
of its members. ·
Operator
for DIS/EISI Africa. |
|
UNITAR: United Nations agency responsible for training |
·
Operator
responsible for implementation of the programme. ·
Ensures political consistency vis-à-vis the other environmental conventions. ·
Responsible
for the training machinery. ·
Training
of trainers. ·
Provision
of training where necessary skills are unavailable
in the location in question. ·
Strengthening
of subregional capabilities. ·
Support
for sub regions and countries on request. |
|
CILSS-ECOWAS: Intergovernmental organization for western
Africa |
·
Responsible
for EISI-WA regional project. ·
Ensures
political consistency at the subregional level. ·
Responsible
for the national projects of the countries in its
subregion. ·
Western
Africa operator. |
|
UMA: Intergovernmental organization for northern
Africa |
·
Ensures
political consistency at the subregional level. ·
Mandates
OSS and its partners with respect to support for implementation
of the EISI-UMA and national EISIs. |
|
IGAD: Intergovernmental organization for eastern
Africa |
·
Responsible
for the EISI-EA regional project as the environment
component of the RIIS. ·
Support
for national EISIs with the backing of OSS, UNITAR
and UNEP. |
|
SADC: Intergovernmental organization for southern
Africa |
·
To
be defined. |
|
ITU: United Nations specialized agency for telecommunications
with a membership comprising Member States (governments
and State operators) and Sector Members (private organizations,
equipment manufacturers, etc.) |
·
Technical
support for telecommunications and Internet. ·
Assistance
with training for the operator staff. ·
Technical
and economic project studies. ·
Relations
with the private sector and telecommunication operators
in the countries in question: ad hoc assistance in
negotiations with operators and in the purchase of
equipment. |
|
GRID-UNEP: United Nations operator for environmental databases |
·
Technical
support for GISWEB and databases. ·
Consistency
with the various environmental programmes: UNEP NET. |
|
UNOPS: Support services office for United Nations
projects |
·
Support
for financial resource mobilization. ·
Support
for finance management. ·
Consistency
with other United Nations programmes. ·
Technical
support for project assembly. ·
Satellite
images. |
|
UNSO-UNDP |
|
|
Others
to be defined |
To be defined according
to terms of reference and competencies. |
6 Budget outline
|
Activities |
Products/Results |
Costs |
|
|
1 Start-up phase |
Survey Development of training materials Continental launch workshop Operator strengthening |
25 000 50 000 50 000 100 000 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Sub-total |
225 000 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 National EISIs |
Launching workshop |
5 000 |
|
|
|
International expert evaluations |
10 000 |
|
|
|
National profile |
5 000 |
|
|
|
Round table |
5 000 |
|
|
|
Equipment |
100 000 |
|
|
|
Technical training |
20 000 |
|
|
|
Supplies |
10 000 |
|
|
|
Evaluation workshop |
5 000 |
|
|
|
Adjustments, updating |
30 000 |
|
|
|
Restitution workshop |
5 000 |
|
|
|
Miscellaneous |
5 000 |
|
|
Sub-total |
|
200 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Subregional EISIs |
Start-up workshop International expert evaluations Equipment Technical training Supplies Evaluation workshop Adjustments, updating Restitution workshop National EISI follow-up Miscellaneous |
25 000 10 000 25 000 50 000 15 000 25 000 30 000 25 000 40 000 5 000 |
|
|
Sub-total |
|
250 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 Regional EISI |
Workshop International expert evaluations Equipment Inventories Structuring - supplies Evaluation workshop Adjustments, updating CD-ROM |
15 000 20 000 25 000 20 000 20 000 15 000 30 000 5 000 |
|
|
Sub-total |
|
150 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 Evaluation - restitution |
Regional wvorkshop Evaluation mission Follow-up reports |
50 000 20 000 20 000 90 000 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Sub-total |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
6
465 000 |
|
|
Administrative and technical costs: 10% |
|
646 500 |
|
|
GRAND TOTAL |
|
7 110 500 |
|




